NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Burton v Babb [2023] NSWCA 242 Hearing dates: 27 September 2023 Decision date: 12 October 2023 Before: Adamson JA at [1]; Simpson AJA at [60] Decision: (1) Refuse leave to appeal. (2) Order the applicant to pay the respondents' costs of the application. Catchwords: LEAVE TO APPEAL — TORTS — applicant charged in Local Court for posting material in apparent breach of suppression order — charges withdrawn as order unenforceable — proceedings commenced against respondents for damages for malicious prosecution — elements of tort not made out — alleged failure of District Court judge to provide reasons, in ignoring essential evidence and finding no proof of damages — whether respondents prosecutors for purposes of tort — applicant failed to identify any issue of principle, question of public importance or reasonably clear injustice COSTS — applicant alleged error in costs order in circumstances where no costs personally incurred by defendants — whether CSO acting without instructions of named defendants — no evidence adduced to challenge retainer — defendants covered individuals for purposes of State of NSW self-insurance arrangement — State entitled to conduct proceedings on behalf of defendants subject to duty of good faith Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 8 Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 (NSW), s 9 Law Reform (Vicarious Liability) Act 1983 (NSW), s 8 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), s 44 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Burton v Babb (District Court (NSW), Weber SC DCJ, 23 May 2023, unrep) Burton v Babb [2020] NSWCA 331 Burton v Local Court of New South Wales [2019] NSWSC 191 Burton v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWCA 245 Davis v Gell (1924) 35 CLR 275; [1924] HCA 56 Doulaveras v Daher [2009] NSWCA 58 Hawksford v Hawksford [2005] NSWSC 463; (2005) 191 FLR 173 Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Pettitt v Dunkley (1971) 1 NSWLR 376 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 State of New South Wales v Landini [2010] NSWCA 157 State of New South Wales v Spedding [2023] NSWCA 180 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Robert Burton (Applicant) Lloyd Babb (First Respondent) Michael Coutts-Trotter (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (self-represented) G Bateman (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate