NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bale v Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd & Ors [2023] NSWSC 1219 Hearing dates: 7 September 2023 Date of orders: 13 October 2023 Decision date: 13 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Slattery J Decision: Defendants ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion on the ordinary basis. Plaintiff's costs of the motion fixed in the sum of $7,700. Catchwords: COSTS – costs follow the event – complex proceedings in which a property transaction ordered as part of final relief – property transaction cannot be implemented without the defendants causing the removal of a caveat – defendants oppose removal of the caveat – plaintiff successful on motion to remove the caveat in order to implement the property transaction – prior agreement between the parties resolving costs issues between them with respect to trial and appeal proceedings – whether the Court should make any costs order in the circumstances – whether the defendants should pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion – whether any order for costs should be on the indemnity basis – whether the Court should make a specified gross sum order instead of assessed costs. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Cases Cited: Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Limited (1993) 44 FCR 194 Bale v Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 820 Bale v Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2022] NSWSC 1009 Bale v Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd (No. 3) [2023] NSWSC 973 Grant v John Grant and Sons (1954) 91 CLR 112 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Karam v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2001] NSWSC 709 Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd v Bale [2023] NSWCA 25 Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd v Bale (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 95 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZTQS [2015] FCA 1069 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Li Qin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 Salkeld v Vernon (1758) 1 Eden 64, 28 ER 608 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Francois Bale First Defendant: Kimberley Developments Pty Ltd Second Defendant: Albert Darwiche Third Defendant: Martin Churchill Fourth Defendant: Chyna Schein Fifth Defendant: Theofanis Trigas Sixth Defendant: Super Start Batteries Pty Ltd Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: D. O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate