NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: D'Cruz v Coutinho [2023] NSWSC 1221 Hearing dates: 18 September 2023 Date of orders: 18 September 2023 Decision date: 18 September 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: McGrath J Decision: See [19] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — ex parte applications —freezing orders — where plaintiff alleges breaches of s 18 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law arising from a set of alleged property investments made by the plaintiffs involving the defendants — where plaintiff argues that exceptional circumstances exist to warrant the making of freezing order — where delay is considered in making the application — HELD — freezing order made Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Lake v Crawford (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 419 Turner v Universal Home Loans Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 936 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Beryl Clotilda D'Cruz (First Plaintiff) Stanislaus Gregory D'Cruz (Second Plaintiff) Jude Savio Pio Coutinho (First Defendant) Pinnacle Property Enterprises t/as Avondale Property Group (Second Defendant) Great Southern Agricultural Holdings Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) QC Project Management Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) Ryan Neil Martinez (Fifth Defendant) Nigel Christian Savio Sequeira (Sixth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: H Fielder (First and Second Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate