NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Leedman v Chahhoud & Ors [2023] NSWSC 1234 Hearing dates: 11 and 18 October 2023 Date of orders: 18 October 2023 Decision date: 18 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Adjournment granted on terms. Defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the adjournment thrown away on the ordinary basis. Costs fixed in the sum of $1,000 pursuant to Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c). Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Mode of appearance at hearing – audio visual link appearance – Pt 1A Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998 – first defendant wishes to defend claim – first defendant resides in Lebanon – unstable internet connection – proceedings would be too difficult to conduct by AVL – first defendant unable to come to Australia in the short term due to immigration restrictions relating to her youngest child – order for the adjournment of proceedings. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Evidence (Audio and Audiovisual Links) Act 1998, ss 5B(1), 5B(2)(a), 5B(2)(c) Cases Cited: Zhang v Zhang [2022] NSWSC 924 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: First Plaintiff: Kim Leedman Second Plaintiff: Anita Leedman Third Plaintiff: Trilam Developments Pty Limited First Defendant: Chadia Chahhoud Second Defendant: Elias Taleb Third Defendant: Fawaz Helou Fourth Defendant: Kassem in his capacity as liquidator of Class 1 Form Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs: D. Krochmalik; A. Lim First Defendant: P. Afshar
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate