NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rikkone v NSW Ombudsman and TAFE NSW [2023] NSWCATAD 278 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 25 October 2023 Decision date: 25 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: P H Molony, Senior Member Decision: The application is dismissed on the basis that it is misconceived and lacking in substance under s 55(1)(b) of the NCAT ACT. Catchwords: Administrative Law – administrative review – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – no jurisdiction to administratively review decisions made under the Technical and Further Education Commission Act 1990 Anti-Discrimination – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – no jurisdiction to consider complaint without a referral under s 95 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Technical and Further Education Commission Act 1990 Cases Cited: Ali Samandi v Ombudsman NSW [2020] NSWCATAD 184 Majoor v Macquarie University [2022] NSWCATAP 213 Texts Cited: None Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Applicant – Esther Vladislavouna Rikkone First Respondent – NSW Ombudsman Second Respondent – TAFE NSW Representation: Applicant – Self-represented First Respondent – M Smith, NSW Ombudsman Second Respondent – Legal Counsel, TAFE NSW File Number(s): 2023/00244182 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate