NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Garbourg v Ku-ring-gai Council [2023] NSWLEC 1631 Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 12 October 2023 Date of orders: 25 October 2023 Decision date: 25 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Walsh C Decision: In proceedings 2023/135865, the Court orders: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development consent DA-139/20 granted by Ku-ring-gai Council on 22 October 2020, and as modified on 12 January 2021, is further modified in the terms in Annexure A. (3) Development consent DA-139/20 as modified by the Court is Annexure B. In proceedings 2023/227271, the Court orders: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Pursuant to s 8.25(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Respondent is directed to issue a building information certificate in relation to the works shown in blue on the plans prepared by PopovBass which form part of the Building Information Certificate Application No. eBCU0028/22 and are identified in Annexure C, with the exception of: (a) The garage door shown on plan 0566-BIC03, revision 01 and 0566-BIC11, revision 01; and (b) The internal door opening to the area labelled "home office" on plan 0566-BIC03, revision 01. (3) The Building Information Certificate referred to in Order (2) directly above, shall be issued by the Respondent within 14 days of the date of these orders. Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders BUILDING INFORMATION CERTIFICATE – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.55, 6.25, 6.26, 8.9, 8.25 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 113 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34, 34AA Cases Cited: Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [1992] NSWLEC 8 Texts Cited: The Australian Building Codes Board, National Construction Code Volume Two Amendment, 2019 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ran Garbourg (Applicant) Ku-Ring-Gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Reid (Applicant) C Rose (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate