NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zhang v Peng [2023] NSWDC 448 Hearing dates: 3-6 April, 14, 16 June and 28 July 2023 Date of orders: 27 October 2023 Decision date: 27 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff for $96,716. (2) Costs and interest reserved, with liberty to apply. (3) Exhibits retained until further order. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – applications pursuant to ss 12DA and 12DB of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) or, in the alternative, s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law, and for negligent misrepresentation – defendant asserted to have misled plaintiff by representations about the desirability of investing in a complex and unregulated investment scheme, both orally and subsequently in WeChat posts - whether representations made – whether made in trade or commerce – whether investment scheme a financial product – whether representations conduct in relation to financial services – whether misleading or deceptive, or false or misleading – causation issues - whether representations negligent – whether duty of care owed – whether duty of care breached – quantum Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), ss 12BB, 12DA, 12DB, 12GF Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 131A; Sch 2 - Australian Consumer Law, ss 4, 18, 235, 236 Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D Cases Cited: Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes [2023] NSWCA 88 Briess v Woolley [1954] AC 333 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Commercial Banking Co of Sydney Ltd v R H Brown & Co (1972) 126 CLR 337 Gan v Xie [2023] NSWCA 163 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2013) 249 CLR 435; [2013] HCA 1 Johnson v Mackinnon (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 22 Lantrak Holdings Pty Ltd v Yammine [2023] FCAFC 156 Li v Yeung [2023] NZHC 1374 Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co [1912] AC 716 Mackinnon as plaintiff representative of 153 plaintiff group members v Partnership of Larter, Jones, Miraleste Pty Ltd t/as USG Partner and Johnson, t/as "STC Sports Trading Club" (No 8) [2019] NSWSC 1658 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Milanex Pty Ltd (in liq) [2011] NSWCA 367 Samsung Electronics v LG Electronics (2015) 113 IPR 11 Tepko Pty Ltd v Waterboard (2001) 206 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 19 Tomasetti v Brailey [2011] NSWSC 1446 Tomasetti v Brailey [2012] NSWCA 399 Tomasetti v Brailey [2013] NSWSC 1282 Wan v Ji [2022] NSWDC 269 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Xuan v Xu [2022] FCA 508 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yajun Zhang (plaintiff) Yan Peng (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B M Zipser (plaintiff) Mr S Bell (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate