NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: oOh!media Fly Pty Limited v Transport for NSW (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 112 Hearing dates: 19 October 2023 Decision date: 19 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Moore J Decision: See rulings at [12], [18] and [20] Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – first instance judgment delivered – parties provided agreed list of questions for determination in first instance hearing – 217 page judgment delivered addressing all agreed questions – answers to be incorporated in agreed Excel spreadsheet to derive quantum of compensation – Applicant considers additional issue should be determined in light of findings – informal application to hear and determine new issue – issue not raised in Applicant's case – issue sought to be raised inconsistent with Applicant's case at first instance hearing – preliminary forensic accounting advice tendered – advice from each party's expert shows extensive further evidence required – matter now sought to be agitated arises from conventional application of long settled and recently applied High Court authority – informal application for further hearing refused INTEREST – answers provided to agreed questions resulted in compensation outcome less than that determined by the Valuer General – obligation on Applicant to repay monies to Respondent – Respondent seeks order that Applicant pay post-judgment interest on money to be repaid – order for post-judgment interest discretionary – not appropriate to exercise discretion to order payment of interest by dispossessed Applicant – order for payment of interest rejected. COSTS – Respondent seeks order for costs of informal application seeking further hearing arising from the first instance decision – costs a matter of discretion – not appropriate to order dispossessed Applicant to pay costs of informal application – application for costs rejected CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PROTECTION – Applicant seeks orders for redaction of confidential information in first instance judgment – no opposition to redaction orders – redactions ordered to be made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 98(1), 101 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 38(2) and 39 Cases Cited: Banno v Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 45 FCR 32 Brock v Roads and Maritime Services (formerly Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW) (2012) 191 LGERA 267; [2012] NSWCA 404 Dillon v Gosford City Council (2011) 184 LGERA 179; [2011] NSWCA 328 Roads & Traffic Authority (NSW) v Mosca (2006) 146 LGERA 335; [2006] NSWCA 159 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: oOh!media Fly Pty Limited (Applicant) Transport for NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J McKelvey, barrister (Applicant) M Astill, barrister (Respondent) Solicitors: Thomson Geer Lawyers (Applicant) Clayton Utz (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/113184 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate