NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Eastview (Australia) Pty. Limited v North Sydney Council [2023] NSWLEC 1641 Hearing dates: Conciliation conferences on 27 July, 9 and 31 August and 27 September 2023 Date of orders: 31 October 2023 Decision date: 31 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Porter C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) Pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the Amended Application, as agreed or assessed. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application No. 404/22 lodged on 20 December 2022, as amended, for the demolition and construction of a five-storey mixed-use residential and commercial development with three levels of basement parking at 165-173 Military Road, Neutral Bay, is determined by the grant of development consent, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure 'A'. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – mixed use – residential – cl. 4.6 written request – height variation – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7, 8.15 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 29, 38 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, cll 2.3, 2.7, 4.3, 4.4A, 4.6, 5.10, 6.10 State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Ch 6, s 6.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: Basix) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development, cll 4, 28, 30 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, s 2.119 Texts Cited: NSW Department of Planning and Environment, Apartment Design Guide, 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eastview (Australia) Pty. Limited (Applicant) North Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Whealy (Solicitor) (Applicant) M Winram (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate