NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cai v R [2023] NSWCCA 270 Hearing dates: 27 October 2023 Date of orders: 8 November 2023 Decision date: 08 November 2023 Before: Kirk JA; Wilson J; Fagan J Decision: 1 Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 2 Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – applicant pleaded guilty to one count of dealing in money intending it to become an instrument of crime – parity – where co-offender received higher discount – where difference between starting point of sentences appropriate to differences in objective gravity of offending – applicant's sentence not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Criminal Code (Cth) Financing Act 2006 (Cth) Cases Cited: Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Crown) Zibin Cai (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: S Duggan (Crown) B Dean (Commissioner of Police) G Wendler (Applicant)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Commonwealth DPP (Crown) Crown Solicitors Office (Commissioner of Police) Jeffreys Lawyers (Applicant) File Number(s): 2020/365255 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 22 July 2022 Before: Judge O'Rouke SC File Number(s): 2020/365255
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate