NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pfister v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2023] NSWCATAD 287 Hearing dates: 26 April 2023 Date of orders: 03 November 2023 Decision date: 03 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: L Rogers, Senior Member Decision: The decision of the Commissioner of Police to refuse Mr Pfister a Category ABH firearms licence is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – Firearms Act 1996 – Application for a Category ABH firearms licence – genuine reason for having a licence – alleged aggressive behaviour and failure to store firearms safely – fit and proper person - public interest and public safety Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409 Lukas v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 268 McKenzie v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2021] NSWCATAD 230 Todororovski v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 192 Wright v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATAD 208 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Markus Pfister (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented) McCullough Robertson Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00346326 Publication restriction: 1. Pursuant to sections 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the publication of the following is prohibited:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate