NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hinkler Ave 1 Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2023] NSWCA 264 Hearing dates: 11 August 2023 Date of orders: 2 November 2023 Decision date: 02 November 2023 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Basten AJA at [2]; Preston CJ of LEC at [71] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against the decision of Moore J of 16 December 2022 in the form of the draft notice of appeal dated 14 March 2023. (2) Direct the applicant to file the appeal within 7 days of this order. (3) Dismiss the appeal. (4) Order the applicant to pay the respondent's costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal. Catchwords: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT – development application for mixed use development – repeal and replacement of environmental planning instrument – savings provision for development application "made, but not yet determined" by commencement date – when development application "made" – requirements to comply with prescribed form and manner – whether compliance with requirements – interpretation and application of requirements Legislation Cited: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (NSW), s 7.7(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4.12, 4.15, 4.16, 8.8, 8.11, 8.14, 14, 76, 77; Pt 8, Div 8.3 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 57 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW), cll 49, 50, 51, 54, 56, 59, 113, 246, 246A, 246B, 255, 256; Div 1 of Pt 15; Sch 1, cl 2(1)(d) State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021 (NSW), Sch 7A, cl 2 Cases Cited: Al Maha Pty Ltd v Huajun Investments Pty Ltd (2018) 233 LGERA 170; [2018] NSWCA 245 Botany Bay City Council v Remath Investments No 6 Pty Ltd (2000) 50 NSWLR 312; [2000] NSWCA 364 Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110; [1976] HCA 24 Chambers v Maclean Shire Council (2003) 126 LGERA 7; [2003] NSWCA 100 Commitment Pty Ltd v Georges River Council (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 94 Currey v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 223; [2003] NSWCA 300 Forrest & Forrest Pty Ltd v Wilson (2017) 262 CLR 510; [2017] HCA 30 Helman v Byron Shire Council (1995) 87 LGERA 349 McGovern v Ku-ring-gai Council (2008) 72 NSWLR 504; [2008] NSWCA 209 Planners North v Ballina Shire Council (2021) 251 LGERA 309 [2021]; NSWLEC 120 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Roads and Maritime Services v Desane Properties Pty Ltd (2018) 98 NSWLR 820; [2018] NSWCA 196 The King v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407; [1944] HCA 42 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55; [1999] NSWCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hinkler Ave 1 Pty Limited (Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Pickles SC / Ms L Sims (Applicant) Mr T Robertson SC / Ms J Reid (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate