NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Black Head Bowling Club Ltd v Harrower [2023] NSWCA 267 Hearing dates: 10–11 October 2023 Decision date: 09 November 2023 Before: Payne JA and Simpson AJA at [1]; Adamson JA at [60] Decision: In respect of the appeal by the Club: (1) Allow the appeal by the Club on ground 6 only. (2) Otherwise dismiss the appeal. (3) Order that Mr Edstein pay the Club's costs of ground 6 of the appeal. (4) Order that the Club pay the costs of the first to seventh respondents to the appeal (the plaintiffs below), other than the costs of grounds 4 and 6. (5) Each party bear their own costs of ground 4 of the appeal. In respect of the cross-appeal by the first to seventh respondents (the plaintiffs below): (6) Allow the cross-appeal by the first to seventh respondents (the plaintiffs below). (7) Dismiss the "Notice of Contention – Cross Appeal" filed by Mr Edstein on 21 March 2023. (8) Order that Mr Edstein pay the first to seventh respondents' (the plaintiffs below) costs of the cross-appeal. In both cases: (9) Set aside orders 2 and 3 made by the primary judge on 27 October 2022 and order 2 made by the primary judge on 3 February 2023 of and in lieu thereof make the following orders: (a) Judgment be entered in favour of the plaintiffs against the second defendant, Mr Edstein. (b) Mr Edstein to pay the plaintiffs damages in the agreed amount. (c) Pursuant to s 5 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) order that Black Head Bowling Club Ltd contribute 50% and Mr John Thomas Edstein contribute 50% to the agreed sum of damages payable to the plaintiffs. Catchwords: APPEALS — TORTS — Negligence — child killed by memorial headstone falling on her at bowling club — monument poorly constructed — whether club liable in negligence — whether club owed duty to undertake reasonable enquiries to ensure fixation of monument was sound — whether club failed to test stability of structure by pushing against it — whether scope of liability should extend to stonemason who constructed monument APPEAL — PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — allegations admitted in defences by eighth respondent/cross-defendant — allegations purportedly withdrawn in further defences — application for leave to withdraw the admissions —whether primary judge erred in refusing to allow admissions to be withdrawn or to admit transcript of the motion Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5D Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 102 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 42, 69, 79, 128, 183 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 5 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW), s 9 Local Government (Approvals) Regulation 1993 (NSW), cll 12, 31 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; [1987] HCA 7 Bitumen and Oil Refineries (Australia) Ltd v Commissioner for Government Transport (1955) 92 CLR 200; [1955] HCA Coffs Harbour City Council v Polglase [2020] NSWCA 265 Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658; [1982] HCA 70 Elphick v Westfield Shopping Centre Management Company Pty Limited [2011] NSWCA 356; (2011) 216 IR 41 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 352; [2011] HCA 36 Macquarie Pathology Services Pty Limited v Sullivan (Court of Appeal (NSW), 28 March 1995, unrep) Paric v John Holland (Constructions) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 58; (1985) 59 ALJR 844 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALR 529 Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Miller (2015) 91 NSWLR 752; [2015] NSWCA 320 Voli v Inglewood Shire Council (1963) 110 CLR 74; [1963] HCA 15 Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375; [2013] HCA 19 Texts Cited: Australia, Department of the Treasury, Review of the Law of Negligence – Final Report, (September 2002) Breach of Duty: A Disappearing Element of the Action in Negligence?" (2017) 76(3) Cambridge Law Journal 480 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Black Head Bowling Club Ltd (Appellant) Tamica Harrower (First Respondent/First Cross-Appellant) Robert Bishop (Second Respondent/Second Cross-Appellant) Bradley Bishop (Third Respondent/Third Cross-Appellant) Junior Henderson by his tutor Tamica Harrower (Fourth Respondent/Fourth Cross-Appellant) Keira Henderson by her tutor Tamica Harrower (Fifth Respondent/Fifth Cross-Appellant) Shiralee Walker (Sixth Respondent/Sixth Cross-Appellant) Nathan Walker (Seventh Respondent/Seventh Cross-Appellant) John Thomas Edstein (Eighth Respondent/Cross Respondent) Insurance Australia Limited t/as CGU Insurance Limited (ACN 000 016 722) (Ninth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Lloyd SC / C Coventry (Appellant) J M Morris SC / M A Gerace SC / A T Green (First to Seventh Respondents/First to Seventh Cross-Appellants) P A Collins / J Chen (Eighth Respondent/Cross Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate