NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kramer v Stone [2023] NSWCA 270 Hearing dates: 4 September 2023 Date of orders: 10 November 2023 Decision date: 10 November 2023 Before: Ward P at [1]; Leeming JA at [257]; Kirk JA at [296] Decision: 1. Dismiss the appellants' notice of motion filed 24 July 2024 with costs. 2. Dismiss the appeal with costs. Catchwords: EQUITY – Proprietary estoppel – Estoppel by encouragement – Knowledge of detriment – Where the deceased promised to leave the property to a sharefarmer who had worked on the property for approximately 40 years – Where the deceased's will did not do so – Where the sharefarmer continued to share farm on the property in reliance on the representation – Whether the deceased needed to have actual knowledge of detrimental reliance on the representation for estoppel to be established PROCEDURE – appeals – further evidence – evidence adduced at subsequent hearing before final orders made – whether such evidence "further evidence" for purposes of Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A – whether appellant should be permitted to rely on such evidence following first hearing to impugn findings made after first hearing Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Commonwealth Constitution, s 73 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A, 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 36.16, 51.51 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Amendment No 15) 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Air Tahiti Nui Pty Ltd v McKenzie (2009) 77 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCA 429 Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 Ambridge Investments Pty Ltd (in liq) (rec apptd) v Baker [2010] VSC 59 Austotel Pty Ltd v Franklins Self-Serve Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 582 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485; [1993] HCA 15 Baden v Societe Generale pour Favouriser le Developpement du Commerce et de l'Industrie en France SA [1992] 4 All ER 161 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Barnes v Alderton [2008] NSWSC 107 Bartier Perry Pty Ltd v Paltos [2021] NSWCA 158 BP v State of New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 223 Carter v Brine [2015] SASC 204 Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 1752; 4 All ER 713 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14 Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394; [1990] HCA 39 Crown Melbourne Ltd v Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd (2016) 260 CLR 1; [2016] HCA 26 Delaforce v Simpson-Cook (2010) 78 NSWLR 483; [2010] NSWCA 84 DHJPM Pty Ltd v Blackthorn Resources Ltd (2011) 83 NSWLR 728; [2011] NSWCA 348 Dillwyn v Llewelyn (1862) 4 De GF & J 517; 45 ER 1285 Donis v Donis (2007) 19 VR 577; [2007] VSCA 89 Doueihi v Construction Technologies Australia Pty Ltd (2016) 92 NSWLR 247; [2016] NSWCA 105 Driclad Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1968) 121 CLR 45; [1968] HCA 91 E Co v Q [2018] NSWSC 442 Evans v Evans [2011] NSWCA 92 Farah Constructions v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Flinn v Flinn [1993] 3 VR 712; [1999] VSCA 109 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Galaxidis v Galaxidis [2004] NSWCA 111 Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101; [1999] HCA 10 Grundt v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd (1937) 59 CLR 641; [1937] HCA 58 Hopgood v Brown [1955] 1 WLR 213 In re Basham, decd [1986] 1 WLR 1498 Jennings v Rice [2003] 1 P&CR 8 Leading Synthetics Pty Ltd v Adroit Insurance Group Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 467 Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107 McNab v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2021) 106 NSWLR 430; [2021] NSWCA 298 Miller Heiman Pty Ltd v Sales Principles Pty Ltd (2017) 94 NSWLR 500; [2017] NSWCA 106 Milling v Hardie [2014] NSWCA 163 Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 6) [2015] FCA 825; (2015) 329 ALR 1 New Zealand Pelt Export Co Ltd v Trade Indemnity New Zealand Ltd [2004] VSCA 163 Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365; [1969] HCA 3 Pham v Gall (2020) 102 NSWLR 269; [2020] NSWCA 116 Plimmer v The Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Wellington [1884] 9 AC 699 Priestley v Priestley [2016] NSWSC 1096 Priestley v Priestley [2017] NSWCA 155 Q v E Co [2020] NSWCA 220; (2020) 383 ALR 469 Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 Riches v Hogben (1985) 2 QR 292 Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505; [2014] HCA 19 Silovi Pty Ltd v Barbaro (1988) 13 NSWLR 466 Sledmore v Dalby [1996] 72 P&CR 196 Steria Ltd v Hutchison [2007] ICR 445 Stone v Kramer (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1716 Stone v Kramer [2021] NSWSC 1456 Stone v Stone [2014] NSWSC 1655 Sullivan v Sullivan [2006] NSWCA 312 Taylor's Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133 Thompson v Palmer (1933) 49 CLR 507; [1933] HCA 61 Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776 Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 (2021) 106 NSWLR 227; [2021] NSWCA 242 Trippe Investments Pty Ltd v Henderson Investments Pty Ltd (1992) 106 FLR 214 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387; [1998] HCA 7 Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96 Texts Cited: A Robertson, "Knowledge and Unconscionability in a Unified Estoppel", (1998) 24(1) Monash University Law Review 115 Heydon JD, Heydon on Contract: The General Part (Thomson Reuters, 2019) J Hamilton, G Lindsay and C Webster, New South Wales Civil Procedure Handbook 2023 (13th ed, 2023, Thomson Reuters) K Handley, "Recent Cases" (2017) 91 Australian Law Journal 812 K Handley, Estoppel by Conduct and Election (2nd ed 2016, Sweet & Maxwell) Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrine & Remedies (5th ed, 2014 Lexis Nexis Butterworths) W Cornish et al, The Oxford History of the Laws of England (2010, Oxford University Press), Vol XI Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hilary Lorraine Kramer (First Appellant) Jaime Ferrer (Second Appellant) David Lindsay Stone (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Wilson SC with M McGirr (Appellants) L Ellison SC with H Bennett (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate