NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fuller v R [2023] NSWCCA 282 Hearing dates: 14 August 2023 Date of orders: 14 August 2023 Decision date: 13 November 2023 Before: Adamson JA at [1] Wright J at [2] Fagan J at [72] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – appeals against sentence – whether sentencing judge erroneously took into account criminal history as an aggravating factor rendering the offending more objectively serious – remarks to be read as a whole – no error established – appeal dismissed CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – appeals against sentence – manifest excess – where non-parole period in excess of statutory ratio – sentence not unreasonable or plainly unjust – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 31(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 3A, 21A(2)(d), 56 Cases Cited: Cherry v R [2017] NSWCCA 150 Honeysett v R [2023] NSWCCA 138 R v Nahlous [2013] NSWCCA 90; 228 A Crim R 50 R v Shankley [2003] NSWCCA 253 Sampson v R [2023] NSWCCA 239 The Queen v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Justin Fuller (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate