NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Holt (No 8) [2023] NSWSC 1363 Hearing dates: 5, 6, 28 July, 7, 11, 17 August 2023 Date of orders: 27 October 2023 Decision date: 10 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: See [118]-[119] Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS — Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) — whether applicant poses an unacceptable risk of committing a serious terrorism offence if not kept in detention under a continuing detention — no dispute regarding alternative of an extended supervision order — risks posed are unacceptable if he is not supervised under an extended supervision order rather than a continuing detention order — not persuaded that anything beyond containment is to be gained from a CDO — consideration of conditions HIGH RISK OFFENDERS — applicant associates with Aryan Terror Brigade, white supremacist and Nazism ideologies — adoption of Germanic persona — searches HIGH RISK OFFENDERS — index offending — manufacturing of homemade slam fire guns — possession of illegal weapons — child abuse material offending — grooming — soliciting child pornography HIGH RISK OFFENDERS — consideration of VERA-2R — consideration of Corner Report — experts did not apply VERA-2R as a predictive tool but as an aid to their clinical assessment — not satisfied that the Corner Report debunks VERA-2R on the evidence in this matter Legislation Cited: Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) ss 20, 29, 34, 37, 39, 42, 59A, 59C Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 State of New South Wales v Holt (Preliminary) [2021] NSWSC 1076 State of New South Wales v Holt [2022] NSWSC 1684 State of New South Wales v Holt (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1365 State of New South Wales v Holt (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 683 State of New South Wales v Holt (No 4) [2023] NSWSC 861 State of New South Wales v Holt (No 5) [2023] NSWSC 1361 State of New South Wales v Holt (No 6) [2023] NSWSC 1367 State of New South Wales v Holt (No 7) [2023] NSWSC 994 Texts Cited: E Corner and H Taylor, Testing the Reliability, Validity, and Equity of Terrorism Risk Assessment Instruments (ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, 2022) Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Michael James Holt (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P McDonald SC with K Curry (Plaintiff) P Coady (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate