NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sethi v The Owners – Strata Plan No 93392 (No 6) [2023] NSWSC 1368 Hearing dates: 8 November 2023 Date of orders: 13 November 2023 Decision date: 13 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Chen J Decision: (1) Order that, pursuant to r 13.4(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), the proceedings be dismissed. (2) Order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – summary disposal – dismissal of proceedings – frivolous or vexatious proceedings – where plaintiff has been permitted significant period of time to replead claim but has demonstrated an unwillingness or inability to do so – whether conduct of plaintiff constitutes an abuse of the process of the courts COSTS – indemnity costs – application for indemnity costs resulting from conduct of a party – where plaintiff has refused to comply with court orders and made allegations of corruption – indemnity costs ordered Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 12 Botany Municipal Council v Secretary, Department of the Arts (1992) 34 FCR 412; [1992] FCA 194 Cabport Pty Ltd v Marinchek (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 131 Colgate Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225; [1993] FCA 801 Crocker v Toys 'R' Us (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 728 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; [1949] HCA 1 Dickens v State of New South Wales (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 485 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 O'Brien v Bank of Western Australia Ltd (2013) 16 BPR 31705; [2013] NSWCA 71 Rana v Commonwealth of Australia [2013] FCA 189 Ridgeway v the Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19; [1995] HCA 66 Rosniak v Government Insurance Office (1997) 41 NSWLR 608 Sethi v The Owners Strata Plan No 93392 [2023] NSWSC 853 Sethi v The Owners Strata Plan No 93392 (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 906 Sethi v The Owners Strata Plan No 93392 (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 907 Sethi v The Owners Strata Plan No 93392 (No 4) [2023] NSWSC 908 Sethi v The Owners Strata Plan No 93392 (No 5) [2023] NSWSC 910 Simmons v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 405 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England [No 3] [2003] 2 AC 1; [2001] UKHL 16 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507; [2015] HCA 28 UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77; [2018] HCA 45 Ugur v Attorney-General for NSW [2019] NSWCA 86 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Akhil Sethi (plaintiff) (self-represented) The Owners – Strata Plan No 93392 (defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Holland (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate