NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hockley v R [2023] NSWCCA 285 Hearing dates: 11 October 2023 Decision date: 17 November 2023 Before: Mitchelmore JA at [1] Rothman J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave is granted to appeal; (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence – offences of sexual intercourse with child aged between 14 and 16 – grooming child for sexual activity – produce child abuse material and other like offending – question of manifest excess – need for some accumulation of sentence to reflect offences against three children - subjective case contradictory and unsupported by objective evidence – absence of remorse – offender who blamed 13 year old victims - prioritisation of rehabilitation in imposition of sentence of offender of 35 years as a "young person" – conclusions favourable to applicant Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1 Munro v R [2006] NSWCCA 350 R v Carter [2003] NSWCCA 243 R v Elfar [2003] NSWCCA 358 R v McGourty [2002] NSWCCA 335 R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Hockley (Applicant) Rex (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) V Garrity (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate