NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Collier v Attorney General (NSW) [2023] NSWCA 273 Hearing dates: 18 May 2023 Date of orders: 16 November 2023 Decision date: 16 November 2023 Before: Ward P at [1]; Kirk JA at [2]; Griffiths AJA at [87] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) The applicant is to file a notice of appeal, in the form of her draft notice of appeal contained within the white folder, within 14 days. (3) Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEALS — Procedure — Vexatious litigants — Where allegations of bias and misconduct without merit — Whether ss 6(a), (c) and (d) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) depend on subjective intent — Whether ss 14 or 17 of the Limitation Act 1969 apply to vexatious proceeding orders — Whether proceedings conducted in a rude and offensive manner can be vexatious — Whether order should be made requiring that leave to institute proceedings be given by Supreme Court — Whether time limit should be imposed on order — No House v The King error established for the discretionary making of vexatious proceeding orders Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 59, 66(1) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 14, 17 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 33.13 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 4, 6, 8, 8(1), 8(2) 8(7), 8(8), 9, 10, 13(1), 12(1), 14(2), 16 Cases Cited: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Collier (No 1) [2022] NSWSC 457 Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Collier (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 903 Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Collier [2020] NSWSC 1572 Attorney General of NSW v Wilson [2010] NSWSC 1008 Attorney General v Tareq Altaranesi [2013] NSWSC 63 Batterham v Nauer [2020] NSWCA 204 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499, [1936] HCA 40 Potier v Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales (2015) 89 NSWLR 284; [2015] NSWCA 129 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 Viavattene v Attorney General (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 44 Victoria International Container Terminal Limited v Lunt (2021) 271 CLR 132; [2021] HCA 11 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; [1992] HCA 34 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited [2018] NSWCA 317 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marion Louise Collier (Applicant) Attorney General of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Advocates: Marion Louise Collier (in person) D Birch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate