NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gabriel v Billett (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 123 Hearing dates: On the papers (written submissions filed 28 and 29 August 2023) Date of orders: 15 November 2023 Decision date: 15 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [35] Catchwords: COSTS — Class 3 proceedings — Discretion under Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 (NSW) — General rule costs should follow the event — Whether usual costs rule is just in the circumstances where offers of compromise were made — Whether reasonable for parties to reject offers — Whether indemnity costs order should be made — Impecuniosity of party — Unsuccessful applicant to pay 50 per cent of respondent's costs of primary proceedings Legislation Cited: Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW) Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 (NSW), s 14 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 20.26 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] All ER 333 Gabriel v Billett [2023] NSWLEC 85 Hofer v Howell Developments Pty Ltd [No 2] [2001] NSWLEC 42; (2001) 113 LGERA 391 James v Douglas [2016] NSWCA 178 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Suncorp-Metway Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 12 Tzavellas v Canterbury City Council (1999) 105 LGERA 262 Category: Costs Parties: Eric Stephen Gabriel (Applicant) Karen Billett (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E S Gabriel, self-represented (Applicant) L Nurpuri (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate