NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Carnegie v Nelson-Carnegie [2023] NSWSC 1379 Hearing dates: 13 November 2023 Date of orders: 15 November 2023 Decision date: 15 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Elkaim AJ Decision: See paragraph 42 Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Hearings — Ex parte — where the defendant was made aware of the hearing date on multiple occasions by the plaintiff — whether the court should proceed in the absence of the defendant. FAMILY LAW — Jurisdiction — Appropriate forum — where the plaintiff seeks to enforce a term sheet entered into pursuant to a financial agreement which sought to divide the parties' assets — whether summons concerned a "matrimonial cause". CONTRACTS — Remedies — Specific performance — where the first two steps in the term sheet were carried out — where the defendant did not respond to requests to complete the final step in the term sheet — whether specific performance, as opposed to damages, was the appropriate approach. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 94 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), Pt VIIIA, s 4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 29.7(2)(a), 40.8 Cases Cited: Bate v Priestley (1989) 13 Fam LR 376 Patel v Patel [2015] NSWDC 2 Perlman v Perlman (1984) 155 CLR 474; [1984] HCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Howard Carnegie (Plaintiff) Tanya Nelson-Carnegie (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Gooley (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate