NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Garland (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1381 Hearing dates: 25 October 2023 Date of orders: 25 October 2023 Decision date: 25 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Leave granted under s 38(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), subject to caveats at [5]. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – leave to cross-examine – DPP conference notes disclosed – cross-examination on conference notes – forensic minefield skilfully negotiated – unfavourable witness – where conference notes suggest witness partisan in favour of the accused – whether leave required – relevant unfairness – order of cross-examination by accused and prosecutor – where previous grants of leave to cross-examine – possible misunderstanding as to the extent of earlier grant of leave to cross-examine – orders and directions capable of alleviating unfairness Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 32, 38(1), 38(1)(a), 38(1)(b), 38(1)(c), 38(3), 101A, 102, 103, 104, 192(2), 192(2)(a), 192(2)(b), 192(2)(c), 192(2)(d) Cases Cited: Odisho v The Queen (2018) 271 A Crim R 325; [2018] NSWCCA 19 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex Stephen Garland Representation: Counsel: B Hatfield SC and R Meagher (Rex) T Hughes (Garland)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Rex) SANS Law (Garland) File Number(s): 2021/00356964 Publication restriction: The witness' name has been redacted to comply with non-publication orders made on 10 October 2023.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate