NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mattiussi v R [2023] NSWCCA 289 Hearing dates: 13 November 2023 Date of orders: 24 November 2023 Decision date: 24 November 2023 Before: Adamson JA (at [1]) Button J (at [2]) R A Hulme AJ (at [3]) Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted and appeal allowed. (2) Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court on 9 September 2022 and in lieu, sentence the applicant to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 7 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 5 years and 3 months. (3) The sentence is taken to have commenced on 15 November 2020. (4) The applicant will become eligible for release on parole upon the expiration of the non-parole period on 14 February 2026. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeals against sentence – failure to backdate sentence to account for time served in pre-sentence custody – parties contributed to sentencing error in providing unnecessarily complicated pre-sentence custody information – error established – failure to sufficiently vary the statutory ratio upon finding special circumstances – adjustment reflects explicit intention – no error – non-parole period in years, months, and days – mathematical precision not required – appeal allowed – applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 611 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 126 and 158 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 24, 44 and 37 Cases Cited: Aiken v R [2011] NSWCCA 208 Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58; (2006) 160 A Crim R 145 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Davidson v R [2022] NSWCCA 153; (2022) 100 MVR 336 Hamilton v R [2016] NSWCCA 59 Karpatsis v R [2013] NSWCCA 111 Kristensen v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 189 R v Deng [2015] SASCFC 176 R v Ellmore [2002] NSWCCA 242 R v Fitzgerald v R [2018] NSWCCA 170 R v Mattiusi (No 3) [2022] NSWDC 406 Salafia v R [2015] NSWCCA 141 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew Mattiussi (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Carroll (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate