NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Berntsen v R [2023] NSWCCA 296 Hearing dates: 5 September 2023 Date of orders: 29 November 2023 Decision date: 29 November 2023 Before: Ward P at [1] Dhanji J [2] Sweeney J [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Inconsistent and unreasonable verdicts — Single complainant — Child sexual assault Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Dansie v The Queen (2022) 274 CLR 651; [2022] HCA 25 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123; [2020] HCA 12 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v TK [2009] NSWCCA 151 Wheeler v R [2019] NSWCCA 255 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Carl Jason Berntsen (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Applicant) E Nicholson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Smythe Wozniak Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/18391 Publication restriction: Publication of the identity of the complainant or any matter likely to lead to her identification prohibited pursuant to s 578A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate