NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cirrus Real Time Processing Systems Pty Ltd v Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 280 Hearing dates: 14 November 2023 Date of orders: 24 November 2023 Decision date: 24 November 2023 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Leeming JA at [70]; Kirk JA at [95] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Set aside the orders made by Ball J on 5 May 2023 and in lieu thereof order: (a) A declaration that on the proper construction of clause 1.1 of Annex E to Attachment B of the contract (B300 Services Support Contract – ACOTS2 (Contract No: HP 201771/2018/001) executed on 31 July 2018 between the plaintiff [now Appellant] as "Contractor" and the defendant [now Respondent] as "Hawker Pacific" with Effective Date of 1 August 2018, the "Base Date Index Value" is the value of the index for the quarter containing the date 1 January 2018 for the calculation of price adjustments on each price adjustment date; (b) The defendant [now Respondent] pay the plaintiff [now Appellant] the outstanding amounts owing to it under the Contract including interest that has accrued on outstanding amounts in accordance with cl 4.3 of the Conditions of Contract; (c) The cross-summons be dismissed. (3) The Respondent pay the Appellant's costs of the appeal. (4) There be no order as to the costs at first instance. Catchwords: CONTRACT — Construction — Interpretation — Contractual purpose — Varied contract to be construed — Commerciality of contractual construction — Price adjustment mechanism — Meaning of Base Date Index Value when that composite term was not defined but when Base Date was defined Legislation Cited: Uniform Commercial Code § 2-209 (U.S.) Cases Cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570; [2008] HCA 57 Berry v Berry [1929] 2 KB 316 Concut Pty Ltd v Worrell [2000] HCA 64; (2000) 75 ALJR 312 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1; (2022) 96 ALJR 89 Creamoata Ltd v The Rice Equalization Association Ltd (1953) 89 CLR 286; [1953] HCA 40 Donau Pty Ltd v ASC AWD Shipbuilder Pty Ltd (2019) 101 NSWLR 679; [2019] NSWCA 185 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544; [2017] HCA 12 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Orica Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 500; [1998] HCA 33 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Sara Lee Household & Body Care (Australia) Pty Ltd (2000) 201 CLR 520; [2000] HCA 35 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd (2009) 76 NSWLR 603; [2009] NSWCA 407 Gloria Jean's Coffees International Pty Ltd v Daboko Ltd [2020] 2 NZLR 488; [2020] NZHC 29 Hillam v Iacullo (2015) 90 NSWLR 422; [2015] NSWCA 196 Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21; [2001] HCA 44 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corporation (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 International Petroleum Investment Company v Independent Public Business Corporation of Papua New Guinea [2015] NSWCA 363 Johnston v Brightstars Holding Company Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 150 Ma Hongjin v SCP Holdings Pte Ltd [2020] SGCA 106 Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd (2001) 210 CLR 181; [2001] HCA 70 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd [2011] NSWCA 297 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Mushroom Composters Pty Ltd v IS & DE Robertson Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 1 MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2019] AC 119; [2018] UKSC 24 Narich Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax [1983] 2 NSWLR 597 Newey v Westpac Banking Corporation [2014] NSWCA 319 Oaklane Dairy Ltd v Flooks [2023] NZHC 1852 Rosas v Toca 2018 BCCA 191 Rye v Phillips 203 Minn 567; 282 NW 459 (1938) Sara Stockham Pty Ltd v WLD Practice Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 51 Skanska Rashleigh Weatherfoil Ltd v Somerfield Stores Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1732 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; [1950] HCA 35 Westpac Banking Corporation v Tanzone Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 25 Willis Australia Ltd v AMP Capital Investors Ltd [2023] NSWCA 158 XL Insurance Co SE v BNY Trust Company of Australia Limited [2019] NSWCA 215 Texts Cited: Perry Herzfeld and Thomas Prince, Interpretation (2nd ed, 2020, Lawbook Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cirrus Real Time Processing Systems Pty Ltd (Appellant) Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate