NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: P v R [2023] NSWCCA 297 Hearing dates: 16 October 2023 Date of orders: 27 November 2023 Decision date: 27 November 2023 Before: Davies J at [1] Fagan J at [2] Dhanji J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – leave to appeal granted – parity – whether applicant has a justifiable grievance in light of the sentences imposed on the co-offenders – manufacture of a large commercial quantity of MDMA – criminal enterprise – group of four offenders – where two co-offenders previously successfully appealed sentences to achieve parity with applicant – where applicant was slightly lower in hierarchy than co-offenders – differentiation justified by other factors – no justifiable sense of grievance established – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bahcekapili v R [2020] NSWCCA 296 C v R [2022] NSWCCA 285 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Nahlous v R (2010) 77 NSWLR 463; [2010] NSWCCA 58 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v NP [2003] NSWCCA 195 R v Waqa (No 2) (2005) 156 A Crim R 454; [2005] NSWCCA 33 Redfern v R (2012) 228 A Crim R 56; [2012] NSWCCA 178 Schembri v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 149 SF v R [2022] NSWCCA 216 Thorn v R (2009) 198 A Crim R 135; [2009] NSWCCA 294 Z v R [2022] NSWCCA 286 Category: Principal judgment Parties: P (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Chhabra with P Ye (Applicant) V Garrity (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate