NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Primmer v R [2023] NSWCCA 301 Hearing dates: 30 October 2023 Date of orders: 01 December 2023 Decision date: 01 December 2023 Before: Davies J at [1] Cavanagh J at [2] Sweeney J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. The sentence imposed by Judge Ingram SC on 1 July 2022 is quashed. 4. In lieu thereof the applicant is sentenced for the offence of demand money with menaces to imprisonment for 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months commencing on 12 October 2021, the sentence expiring on 11 October 2025 and the non-parole period expiring on 11 April 2024. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Future commencement date of sentence — Delay — Revocation of parole — Manifest excess Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58; (2006) 160 A Crim R 145 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Munda v Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [2013] HCA 38 R v Fernando [2002] NSWCCA 28 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 Tompkins v R [2019] NSWCCA 37 White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190; (2016) 261 A Crim R 302 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 233 A Crim R 460 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scott Primmer (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Fraser (Applicant) T Abdulhak (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate