NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Skyton Holdings No 5 Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2023] NSWLEC 1724 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference held on 24 November 2023 Date of orders: 01 December 2023 Decision date: 01 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: The Court orders: (1) The written request, prepared by Think Planners, dated 19 April 2023, pursuant to clause 4.6 of the Strathfield Local Environmental Plan 2012 and seeking a variation to the height of building development standard, pursuant to clause 4.3, is upheld. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application DA2021/272, which seeks the demolition of existing structures, tree removal, and construction of a part 4 storey, part 5 storey residential flat building with basement car parking containing 45 residential units on Lot 3 in Deposited Plan (DP) 1261802, also known as 74-76 Marlborough Road, Homebush West, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – residential flat building – breach in height development standard – variation of development standard - conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 4.47, 8.7 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cll 49, 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, Ch 4, s 4.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, ss 2.47, 2.98, 2.99 State Environmental Planning Policy 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development, cll 28, 30 Strathfield Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 2.3, 4.3, 4.6 Texts Cited: Strathfield Development Control Plan 20 – Parramatta Rd Corridor 2006 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Skyton Holdings No 5 Pty Ltd (Applicant) Strathfield Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Gough (Solicitor) (Applicant) M Mallos (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate