NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wulff v Transport for NSW [2023] NSWCATOD 176 Hearing dates: 16 August 2023 Date of orders: 30 November 2023 Decision date: 30 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J McAteer Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the Respondent is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Fit and Proper person – good repute – seriousness of offending – fitness – honesty – integrity – still serving terms of sentence – insufficient time since offending Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Passenger Transport Act 1990 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 94 ALR 11 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA; (1979) 46 FLR 409 Farquharson v Director General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 53 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No 2) [1955] 93 CLR 127 R v Wulff, R v Oxenbridge, R v Myers, R v Walker [2019] QCA 183 Stricke v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATOD 100 Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: Carl Wulff (Applicant) Transport for NSW (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) TfNSW Legal (K Hudson) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/00173471 Publication restriction: Nil
Reasons for decision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate