NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Roselands Star Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2023] NSWLEC 1726 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference held on 24 November 2023 Date of orders: 01 December 2023 Decision date: 01 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: The Court orders: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development Application DA-500/2020, which seeks the demolition of existing structures, lot amalgamation of three lots into one lot, and construction of a five-storey shop-top housing development over two levels with basement car parking and landscaping on Lots 1 and 2 in Deposited Plan (DP) 511598, and Lot X in DP 418488, also known as 892-906 Canterbury Road, Roselands, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A. (3) The Applicant must pay the Respondent's costs thrown away, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed, in the amount of $6,000 (ex GST). Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – shop top housing development – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 2012, cl 2.3 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 4.47, 8.7, 8.15 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cll 49, 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, Ch 4, s 4.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, s 2.119 State Environmental Planning Policy 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development, cll 28, 30 Cases Cited: Canterbury Development Control Plan 2012 Texts Cited: NSW Department of Planning and Environment, Apartment Design Guide, 2015 Canterbury Development Control Plan 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roselands Star Pty Ltd (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Alder (Solicitor) (Applicant) M Bonanno (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate