NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eppinga v Kalil [2023] NSWCA 287 Hearing dates: 20 November 2023 Date of orders: 1 December 2023 Decision date: 01 December 2023 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Kirk JA at [105]; Stern JA at [106] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed; (3) Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the application for leave and the appeal. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defamatory matter – capacity to convey pleaded imputations DEFAMATION – online publication – Facebook post – extent of publication – where proof of publication to only two online readers – relevance to damages DEFAMATION – defences – common law qualified privilege –reply to online attack – where parties agreed matter complained of was published on occasion of privilege and was sufficiently connected to the occasion of privilege – malice – where witness and contemporaneous documents demonstrated publisher's state of mind – whether appellant discharged burden of proving malice Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 99 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 10A, 30 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 91 Cases Cited: Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309 ASIC v Hellicar (2012) 247 CLR 345; [2012] HCA 17 Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 366; [2004] HCA 5 Boensch v Pascoe (2019) 268 CLR 593; [2019] HCA 49 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Bristow v Adams [2012] NSWCA 166 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Cush v Dillon (2011) 243 CLR 298; [2011] HCA 30 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Fraser v Holmes [2009] NSWCA 36; 253 ALR 538 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 King v Muriniti [2018] NSWCA 9 KSMC Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Hubba Bubba Childcare on Haig v Bowden [2020] NSWCA 28 Kuru v State of New South Wales (2008) 236 CLR 1; [2008] HCA 26 Lee v Lee (2019) 266 CLR 129; [2019] HCA 28 Ling v Pang [2023] NSWCA 112 Loveday v Sun Newspapers Ltd (1938) 59 CLR 503 LVMH Watch & Jewellery Australia Pty Ltd v Michael Lassanah & Ors [2011] NSWCA 370 Muriniti v Kalil [2022] NSWCA 109 Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 Reader's Digest Services Pty Ltd v Lamb (1982) 150 CLR 500 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ellie Rose Eppinga (appellant) Mahmoud Kalil (first respondent) Magda Kalil (second respondent) Representation: Counsel: LC Muriniti, solicitor (appellant) K Smark SC (first and second respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate