NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Edwards v Merlaust Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1477 Hearing dates: 24 November 2023 Date of orders: 5 December 2023 Decision date: 05 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Unless the parties approach to be heard within 7 days, Mr and Mrs Edwards bear Merlaust's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEALS — Procedure — Further evidence on appeal — appeal from Local Court — Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 39 — Whether plaintiffs could tender evidence on appeal not relied on at first instance and for which leave had not been sought — Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 50.16 — Appeal confined to an error of law — evidence could only raise questions of fact — not for this Court to determine - receipt of evidence not relied on upon first instance refused APPEALS — Procedure — whether a question of law raised for the first time on appeal could be considered — only in exceptional circumstances —expedient in the interests of justice to consider the new legal arguments raised on construction questions CONTRACTS — Construction — Interpretation —Consideration — whether there was a binding contract which varied a lease — whether any consideration was given — no consideration when a promisor promises to do something they are already bound to do — past consideration is not good consideration — no additional consideration given —appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 39(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 50.16, 42.1 Cases Cited: Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; (1986) 162 CLR 1 Director of Public Prosecutions for Victoria v Le [2007] HCA 52 Larkin v Girvan (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 365 Rose v Tunstall [2018] NSWCA 241 SAS Realty Developments v Kerr [2013] NSWCA 56 Searle v Commonwealth of Australia [2019] NSWCA 127 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd [1950] HCA 35; (1950) 81 CLR 418 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No. 2) [1985] HCA 28; (1985) 59 ALJR 481, at 483; [1985] HCA 28; 60 ALR 68 White Pointer Investments Pty Ltd v Creative Academy Group Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 817 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Edwards (First Plaintiff) Maureen Edwards (Second Plaintiff) Merlaust Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M V Sahade (Plaintiffs) Q Rares (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate