NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hawkins (No 5) [2023] NSWSC 1497 Hearing dates: 28 November 2023 Date of orders: 28 November 2023 Decision date: 28 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) Objection by accused to answering questions in cross-examination upheld. (2) Accused required to answer questions. (3) Accused shall have a certificate under s 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – privilege against self-incrimination – where accused elects to give evidence in his murder trial – where circumstantial case includes lies told to police to be used to support consciousness of guilt reasoning – explanation for lies includes involvement in drug transaction – evidence-in-chief oblique and no objection taken – objection taken in cross-examination concerning details – section 128 certificate – application for a certificate – objection upheld – accused required to answer questions – certificate granted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 128 Cases Cited: Cornwell v The Queen (2007) 231 CLR 260; [2007] HCA 12 R v Cranston (No 20) [2022] NSWSC 1578 Song v Ying (2010) 79 NSWLR 442; [2010] NSWCA 237 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex Jason Paul Hawkins Representation: Counsel: B Hatfield SC (Rex) B Bickford (Hawkins)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Rex) Hugo Law Group (Hawkins) File Number(s): 2021/00336983 Publication restriction: Not to be published beyond the parties until the conclusion of the trial.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate