NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v IP [2023] NSWCCA 314 Hearing dates: 24 November 2023 Date of orders: 24 November 2023 Decision date: 24 November 2023 Before: Harrison CJ at CL, Wright and Wilson JJ Decision: See [33] Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – Crown appeal pursuant to Criminal Appeal Act s 5F(3A) – doli incapax – where respondent aged between ten and fourteen at time of alleged offending – knowledge and development for doli incapax purposes – whether evidence if admitted would substantially weaken the Crown case Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5F(3A) Criminal Code 1899 (QLD) s 29 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 136 Cases Cited: AL v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 34 BDO v The Queen [2023] HCA 16 R v Shamouil (2006) 66 NSWLR 228; [2006] NSWCCA 112 RP v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 641; [2016] HCA 53 The Queen v M [1977]16 SASR 589 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) IP (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Wright SC with C Curtis (Appellant) B J Rigg SC with P Krisenthal (Respondent)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Ramsland Laidler (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/9349 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 20 November 2023 Before: Sweeney J File Number(s): 2022/00009349
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate