NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Turnbull v Clarence Valley Council [2023] NSWCA 295 Hearing dates: 19 October 2023 Date of orders: 8 December 2023 Decision date: 08 December 2023 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Basten AJA at [56] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is refused; 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the application. Catchwords: Appeals – application for leave to appeal from summary dismissal of proceedings – pleading disclosed no reasonable cause of action – no prospect that leave to replead would result in viable claim – leave to appeal refused – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: BBH v The Queen (2012) 245 CLR 499; [2012] HCA 9 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Goktas v Government Insurance Office (NSW) (1993) 31 NSWLR 684 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Luke Turnbull (Applicant) Clarence Valley Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant in person J Guihot (Respondent)
Solicitors: Not applicable Moray & Agnew (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/80345 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Civil Citation: Turnbull v Clarence Valley Council [2023] NSWSC 83 Date of Decision: 14 February 2023 Before: Schmidt AJ File Number(s): 2022/73988
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate