NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Clark v Zele [2023] NSWCA 296 Hearing dates: 28 November 2023 Date of orders: 11 December 2023 Decision date: 11 December 2023 Before: Payne JA [1]; Kirk JA [2]; Stern JA [3]. Decision: (1) Time for filing a notice of appeal is extended to 3 October 2023 under UCPR, r 51.16(2). (2) The appeal is dismissed. (3) Mr Clark is to pay Mr and Mrs Zele's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CONTRACT – sale of residential property – the appellant and respondents entered into a contract for the sale of the appellant's property – completion did not occur by the completion date – the respondents sought and were granted specific performance and declaratory relief with the question of damages reserved – Parker J found deposit payable under contract of sale was paid in full by the respondents and was valid and binding – specific performance later became impossible – matter relisted before the Real Property List Judge – both parties purport to terminate the contract of sale – further hearing before Peden J to determine whether respondents are entitled to return of deposit paid under the contract of sale – appellant contends deposit not fully paid as sum of $3,750 had been forfeited pursuant to Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 66V – the respondents rescinded an earlier contract during the cooling off period – appellant contends forfeited amount cannot form part of the deposit under the contract of sale – Peden J declared the respondents validly terminated contract – Peden J ordered return of deposit to the respondents – Peden J's orders made in accordance with earlier finding of Parker J that deposit was paid by respondents in full – whether Peden J erred in returning deposit amount to respondents – where appellant does not challenge earlier judgment or orders of Parker J. APPEALS – procedure – appellant filed notice of intention to appeal on 10 July 2023 – appellant filed notice of appeal on 13 September 2023 – appellant served notice of appeal on 3 October 2023 – notice of appeal served out of time – respondent does not oppose extension of time for filing notice of appeal – extension of time for filing notice of appeal allowed pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.16(2). Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 66U, 66V(2), 66V(3), 66V(8), 66X Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 101(1), 101(2)(r) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 51.16(1), 51.16(2). Cases Cited: Despot v Registrar General of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 5 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28; (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Zele v Clark [2022] NSWSC 925 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Bernard Clark (Appellant) Paul Stefan Zele (First respondent) Anne Margaret Zele (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate