NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shalhoub v Johnson [2023] NSWDC 555 Hearing dates: 26 October 2023 Date of orders: 13 December 2023 Decision date: 13 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Summons dismissed; plaintiff's grounds of appeal dismissed. (2) Costs reserved with liberty to apply, including the bringing of any application for a gross sum costs order. (3) Liberty to apply in relation to any claim for interest. (4) Exhibits retained until further order. Catchwords: COSTS APPEAL – costs of a four-day trial in the Equity Division awarded to the defendants on an indemnity basis – plaintiff appeals from Costs Assessor to Review Panel and from Review Panel to the District Court – nature of a rehearing – whether sufficient consideration given to proportionality issues – whether charges by solicitors overlapped – whether briefing senior counsel (without a junior) excessive for assertedly simple Equity proceedings – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 60, 98(4), 149 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 177 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37M(2)(e) Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014 (NSW), s 172 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), s 89 Cases Cited: Behnia v Sarraf (No 2) [2019] NSWDC 281 Gazecki v McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd (2020) 102 NSWLR 259; [2020] NSWCA 98 Gilmore Finance Pty Ltd v Aesthete No 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 114 Grizonic v Suttor [2008] NSWSC 914 Jones v Sutton (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 203 Laro-Bashford v Miros [2016] VSC 77 Mohareb v State of New South Wales [2023] NSWCA 289 Perth Airport Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Ltd (No 3) [2022] WASC 51 Price v BW & RD Smart (No 2) [2020] SASCFC 15 Roberts v Rodier [2006] NSWSC 1084 Rock v Henderson [2021] NSWCA 155 Sanderson as liquidator of Sakr Nominees Pty Ltd (in liq) v Sakr (2017) 93 NSWLR 459; [2017] NSWCA 38 Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd (2004) 65 NSWLR 151; [2004] NSWCA 281 Stanley v Phillips (1966) 115 CLR 470 Texts Cited: Roger Gyles AO KC, "A Review of the Senior Counsel Protocol", Bar News, Winter 2020 at p 9 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maria Shalhoub (Plaintiff) Michael Joseph Johnson (Defendant) Sheila Pyper Royles (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Sahade (Plaintiff) Mr R O'Gorman-Hughes (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate