NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hazan v The Manager, Costs Assessment [2023] NSWSC 1587 Hearing dates: In chambers Date of orders: 15 December 2023 Decision date: 15 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) Refuse the second defendant's application for costs. (2) The second defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs in the sum of $163,484.13. (3) The second defendant to pay the third defendant's costs in the sum of $33,677.60. Catchwords: COSTS — review of decision by manger, costs assessment granting the second defendant an extension of time to bring costs assessment application — whether the manager failed to deal with and consider the substance of the plaintiff's case — consideration of second defendant's change of position — second defendant's unilateral withdrawal of its application for a costs assessment - capitulation — second defendant liable for plaintiffs' costs and Sanderson orders warranted — assessment of costs on a gross sum basis and any discounts Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) ss 76, 83B, 93B, 198 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australia Wide Airlines Ltd v Aspirion Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 365 Australiawide Airlines Limited v Aspirion Constructions Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 365 Edwards Madigan Torzillo Briggs Pty Ltd v Stack [2003] NSWCA 302 Great Lakes Shire Council v Dederer (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 336 McNamara v San [2010] NSWSC 809 Nichols v NFS Agribusiness Pty Ltd (2018) 97 NSWLR 681; [2018] NSWCA 84 Re Cabramatta King Tea Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 462 Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Sanderson v Blyth Theatre Company Limited [1903] 2 KB 533. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yves Raphael Hazan (First Plaintiff) Peter Whitehead (Second Plaintiff) Manager, Costs Assessment (First Defendant) Diane Maloney (Second Defendant) Grahame Richardson SC (Third Defendant) Michael Todd (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Kieran Smark SC with Talitha Fishbrun (Plaintiffs) Philippe Doyle Gray (Second Defendant) Declan Roche (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate