NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v B & E Foods Pty Ltd & Ors [2023] NSWDC 569 Hearing dates: 29 November 2023 Date of orders: 15 December 2023 Decision date: 15 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Strathdee DCJ Decision: (1) B & E Foods Pty Ltd is convicted. (2) The appropriate fine for the offence is $500,000 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty. (3) Accordingly, I order B & E Foods Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $375,000. (4) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed above at (3) is to be paid to the prosecutor. (5) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), B & E Foods Pty Ltd is to pay the prosecutor's costs, as agreed or assessed. (6) Xu Chun Dong is convicted. (7) The appropriate fine for the offence is $50,000 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty. (8) Accordingly, I order Xu Chun Dong to pay a fine of $37,500. (9) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed above at (8) is to be paid to the prosecutor. (10) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Xu Chun Dong is to pay the prosecutor's costs, as agreed or assessed. (11) E & J International Pty Ltd is convicted. (12) The appropriate fine for the offence is $350,000 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty. (13) Accordingly, I order E & J International Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $262,500. (14) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed above at (13) is to be paid to the prosecutor. (15) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), E & J International Pty Ltd is to pay the prosecutor's costs, as agreed or assessed. (16) NL Workforce Solutions Pty Ltd is convicted. (17) The appropriate fine for the offence is $350,000 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty. (18) Accordingly, I order NL Workforce Solutions Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $262,500. (19) Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of the fine imposed above at (18) is to be paid to the prosecutor. (20) Pursuant to s 257B of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), NL Workforce Solutions Pty Ltd is to pay the prosecutor's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury – maximum penalty SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – appropriate discount for the utility of the plea – general deterrence – specific deterrence – remorse and contrition – maximum penalties COSTS – prosecutor's costs Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Fines Act 1996 (NSW) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations v Nash (2016) 93 NSWLR 338 Capral Aluminium Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (2000) 49 NSWLR 610 Environmental Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 Fisher v Samaras Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 82 IR 384 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Lawrenson Diecasting Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (1999) 90 IR 464 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Morrison v Powercoal Pty Ltd (No 3) (2005) 147 IR 117 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCCA 96 Orbit Drilling v The Queen (2012) 35 VR 399 R v Cage [2006] NSWCCA 304 R v MA [2004] NSWCCA 92 R v Miria [2009] NSWCCA 68 R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412 SafeWork NSW v Grandcity Constructions Pty Ltd [2018] NSWDC 398 SafeWork NSW v HCM Building Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 632 SafeWork NSW v Poletti Corporation [2019] NSWDC 491 SafeWork v Tunny Pty Ltd; SafeWork NSW v Waring [2022] NSWDC 306 WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Profab Industries Pty Ltd (2000) 49 NSWLR 700 WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Sarjame Storage Pty Ltd [2015] NSWDC 151 Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor) B & E Foods Pty Ltd, NL Workforce Solutions Pty Ltd, E & J International Pty Ltd and Xu Chun Dong (Defendants) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Moir (for the Prosecutor) Mr S McIntosh (for the Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate