NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Greyhound Welfare and Integrity Commission v Grech [2023] NSWSC 1603 Hearing dates: 4 May 2023 Date of orders: 18 December 2023 Decision date: 18 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) Dismiss the application for judicial review and the summons. (2) The plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — judicial review — review of tribunal decision — Greyhound Racing Act 2017 (NSW) — regulation of greyhound racing — power to register greyhound racing participants — greyhound racing registrations — statutory interpretation — consideration of surplusage — whether tribunal fell into error of law in exercising registration power — consideration of jurisdictional fact — fit and proper person test — whether failure to take into account relevant considerations — whether decision unreasonable Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 530 Greyhound Racing Act 2017 (NSW) ss 3A, 40, 44, 47-50, 58 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 34(2)(a) Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 (NSW) s 21(1)(d) Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983 (NSW) ss 15A, 16, 17A Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 69 Cases Cited: AB v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2014] NSWCA 122 Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27; [2009] HCA 41 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr (2012) 83 NSWLR 302; [2012] NSWCA 13 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321; [1990] HCA 33 Attorney General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; [1990] HCA 33 Ballantyne v Workcover Authority of NSW [2007] NSWCA 239 Bay Simmer Investments Pty Ltd v New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 135; (2017) 222 LGERA 286 CIC Insurance Limited v Bankstown Football Club Limited (1997) 187 CLR 384; [1997] HCA 2 CN17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 268 CLR 76; (2019) 94 ALJR 140; [2019] HCA 50 Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405 Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472; [1993] HCA 78 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Hockey v Yelland (1984) 157 CLR 124; [1984] HCA 72 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123; [2018] HCA 34 Malaysian Declaration Case (2011) 244 CLR 144; [2011] HCA 32 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986)162 CLR 24; [1986] HCA 40 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611; [2010] HCA 16 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323; [2001] HCA 30 Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCA 121; (2007) 171 A Crim R 510 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 273 CLR 506; [2021] HCA 17 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; (2022) 96 ALJR 737 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 96 ALJR 497 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Purcell v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 269 R v Berchet (1688) 1 Show KB 106 Ramskogler v Director of Public Prosecutions (1995) 82 A Crim R 128 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252; [2010] HCA 23 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 46 NSWLR 55; [1998] NSWCA 8 Trives v Hornsby Shire Council (2015) 89 NSWLR 268; [2015] NSWCA 158 Warkworth Mining Ltd v Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc (2014) 86 NSWLR 527; [2014] NSWCA 105 Wattie v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Justice (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 124 Texts Cited: M Aronson, M Groves, G Weeks, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (7th ed, Lawbook Co, 2022) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Greyhound Welfare and Integrity Commission (Plaintiff) Donna Grech (First Defendant) Racing Appeals Tribunal (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Watts (Plaintiff) A Hourigan (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate