NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Teo & Anor v Twyford bht Cunningham (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1626 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 19 December 2023 Decision date: 19 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Henry J Decision: Defendant's application for indemnity costs refused Catchwords: COSTS — Application for indemnity costs on the basis of unsuccessful plaintiffs' failure to accept Calderbank offer — Where offer made following filing of defence — No variation to the orders that costs payable on an ordinary basis Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam Law 93; [1975] 3 All ER 333 James v Douglas [2016] NSWCA 178 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 Ofria v Cameron (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 242 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; (1998) 152 ALR 83; [1998] HCA 11 Valmont Interiors Pty Ltd v Giorgio Armani Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] NSWCA 160 Category: Costs Parties: Carolyn Teo (First Plaintiff) Raven Gibb-Kalvin Spirit (Second Plaintiff) David Twyford by his tutor Maurice Cunningham (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E White (Plaintiffs) J Gatland (Defendant)
Solicitors: Webb Thom & Associates (Plaintiffs) Cunningham Solicitors (Defendant) File Number(s): 2021/00201440 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate