NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association DP No 285853 (No 4) [2023] NSWCA 329 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 22 December 2023 Decision date: 22 December 2023 Before: Stern JA Decision: (1) The applicants' notice of motion filed on 29 November 2023 is dismissed. (2) Leave to issue a subpoena is refused. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Teoh order – where the applicants filed a notice of motion seeking to set aside and vary orders under UCPR, r 36.16 – where application does not raise any new issue and the issues raised have now been repeatedly determined against the applicants – where applicants directed to show cause why the Court should not summarily dismiss proceedings as vexatious and an abuse of process – whether application should be dismissed as vexatious and an abuse of process CIVIL PROCEDURE – Subpoena – where leave to issue a subpoena refused by Deputy Registrar on the basis that there were no active proceedings at the time when the subpoena was filed – where applicants made a further application for leave to issue that subpoena – where documents are being sought by the applicants to support contentions considered and rejected by this Court – whether leave to issue the subpoena should be granted Legislation Cited: Community Land Management Act 2021 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 46(1)(b) Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 36.16(3A) Cases Cited: Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association DP No 285853 (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 176 Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association DP No 285853 (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1524 Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association DP No 285853 (No 3) [2023] NSWCA 266 Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association DP No 285853 [2022] NSWSC 746 Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association DP No 285853 [2023] NSWCA 103 Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association No DP 285853 [2022] NSWSC 1663 Arjunan v Neighbourhood Association No DP 285853 [2022] NSWSC 691 Aukuso v Tahan [No 2] [2018] NSWCA 302 Hancock v Arnold; Dodd v Arnold (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 19 Majak v Rose (No 5) [2017] NSWCA 238 Proietti v Proietti (No 3) [2023] NSWCA 199 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Refrigerated Roadways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 336 State of New South Wales v Hollingsworth (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 283 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 4) (2011) 81 NSWLR 771; [2011] NSWCA 324 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Kannapiran Chinna Arjunan (First Applicant) Thangam Kannapiran (Second Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate