NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Advertising Printing Australia Pty Ltd v Silverwater Plumbing Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATAP 8 Hearing dates: 7 November 2023 Date of orders: 16 January 2024 Decision date: 16 January 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Thode, Principal Member P H Molony, Senior Member Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Leave to appeal under cl 12(1)(c) of Sch 4 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) is refused. (2) The decision made by the Tribunal on File Number GEN 23/27835 on 12 July 2023 is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division to be reconsidered with further evidence allowed. Catchwords: APPEALS – leave to appeal - new evidence – leave to appeal under cl 12(1)(c) Sch 4 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 refused – failure to consider relevant consideration - damages – inadequacy of reasons – no explanation of how damages assessed. PROCEDURE – ex parte hearing under rule 35 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 - failure to take into consideration undefended hearing evidence which could constitute a complete defence to claim – Tribunal's obligation to satisfy itself that claim made out – failure to consider a relevant consideration. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Cases Cited: Al-Daouk v Mr Pine Pty Ltd t/as Furnco Bankstown [2015] NSWCATAP 111 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Cervantes (2012) 61 MVR 443, [2012] NSWCA 244 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1427 CEO of Customs v AMI Toyota Ltd (2000) 102 FCR 578 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Crescendo Management Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 19 NSWLR 40 Eadie v Harvey [2017] NSWCATAP 201 Elsayed v Tassone [2022] NSWCATAP 69 John Prendergast & Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Orr [2019] NSWCA 231 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Rodger v De Gelder (2015) 71 MVR 514, [2015] NSWCA 211 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Troy Hood trading as UR Place Landscape v Rutten [2016] NSWCATAP 250 Universe Tankships Inc of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation ("The Universe Sentinel") [1983] AC 366 Waters v Waghorn [2016] NSWCATAP 247 Texts Cited: Lexis Nexis Australia, Halsbury's Law of Australia, at [325-6925] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Advertising Printing Australia Pty Ltd (Appellant) Silverwater Plumbing Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: K Bajaj (Agent) (Appellant) K Karham (Agent) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/00234773 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 12 July 2023 Before: J Levingston, General Member File Number(s): GEN 23/27035
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate