NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Blanch v Smith [2024] NSWCATAD 20 Hearing dates: 23 November 2023 Date of orders: 22 January 2024 Decision date: 22 January 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: L Andelman, Senior Member Decision: The Tribunal declines to deal with the application as it involves an exercise of federal jurisdiction. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appropriate orders where claim involves federal jurisdiction - summary dismissal of proceedings under s 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Act 2013 HUMAN RIGHTS – Transgender vilification –aiding and abetting CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (Cth) – Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine complaint – federal jurisdiction - where respondents raised constitutional claim of implied freedom of communication on political matters – whether s38S of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 imposes an unjustified burden on the implied freedom of political communication – whether the respondents' claim was genuinely raised – whether the respondents' claim was not capable on its face of legal argument. Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Civil and Administrative Act 2013 Cases Cited: Burns v Corbett [2018] HCA 15; (2018) 265 CLR 304 Citta Hobart Pty Ltd v Cawthorn [2022] HCA 16; 96 ALJR 476 Clubb v Edwards [2019] HCA 11; (2019) 267 CLR 171 Comcare v Banerji [2019] HCA 23; (2019) 267 CLR 373 David Cawthorn and Paraquad Association of Tasmania Incorporated v Citta Hobart Pty Ltd and Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd [2019] TASADT 10 Farm Transparency International Ltd v New South Wales [2022] HCA 23; 96 ALJR 655 Gleeson v Cavers:Cavers v Gleeson [2021] NSWCATCD 158 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1997] HCA 25; (1997) 189 CLR 520 McCloy v New South Wales [2015] HCA 34; (2015) 257 CLR 178 Sunol v Collier [2012] NSWCA 44 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Stephanie Blanch (Applicant) Kirralie Smith & Binary Australia Ltd (Respondents) Attorney General of NSW (Intervenor) Representation: Counsel: C Gregory (Applicant) F Maghami (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate