NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: City Garden Australia Pty Ltd (in administration) as trustee for the Ming Tian City Garden Unit Trust v Dai (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 22 Hearing dates: On the papers, last submissions 22 January 2024 Date of orders: 31 January 2024 Decision date: 31 January 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Rees J Decision: Compensation and costs orders made. Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – plaintiff sues former director in respect of invalid appointment of his wife as company secretary and entering into series of unauthorised loans to provide working capital for his building company – director maintained the lie to the end – provided a basis for other defendants to strenuously defend all aspects of plaintiff's claim – resulted in longer trial – increased plaintiff's costs significantly – indemnity costs order made. COSTS – plaintiff loses claims against lenders who advanced the unauthorised loans – plaintiff now in liquidation – gross sum costs order made to avoid wasted costs of assessment, to both the lender and liquidator – s98(4)(c) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) EQUITABLE COMPENSATION – plaintiff's solicitor to provide equitable compensation, being 75% of plaintiff's indebtedness to lenders – whether equitable compensation can include lenders' costs. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), section 1317H Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), section 98(4)(c) Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich (2009) 236 FLR 1 Barrett Property Group Ltd v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 1823 Baychek v Baychek [2010] NSWSC 987 Beach Petroleum NL & Anor v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Berkeley Administration Inc v McClelland [1990] FSR 565 Berry v British Transport Commission [1962] 1 QB 306 City Garden Australia Pty Ltd (in administration) as trustee for the Ming Tian City Garden Unit Trust v Dai [2023] NSWSC 1498 Dobbs v National Bank of Australasia Ltd (1935) 53 CLR 643 Dustan v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (No 3) [2006] FCA 916 Gate v Sun Alliance Insurance Ltd (1995) 8 ANZ Ins Case 61-251 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Gray v Sirtex Medical Ltd (2011) 193 FCR 1 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2002] FCA 628 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 23 In the matter of Indoor Climate Technologies Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 356 Ivory v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2001] QSC 102 Leary v Leary [1987] 1 WLR 72 Leary v NSW Trustee & Guardian (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1226 Ragata Developments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Raulfs v Fishy Bite Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 135 Corporation (FCA 5 March 1993, unreported) Sande v Medsara Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWSC 262 Sony Entertainment (Australia) Ltd v Smith (2005) 215 ALR 788 Sparnon v Apand Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 164 Stemson v AMP General Insurance (NZ) Ltd [2007] 1 NZLR 289 Talacko v Talacko (2021) 389 ALR 178 Vance v Vance (1981) 128 DLR (3d) 109 Texts Cited: Dal Pont, Law of Costs (4th ed, 2018) Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Consequential orders Parties: City Garden Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Meng Dai (First Defendant) Gerrard Toltz Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Gemi 130 Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Bridge Street Capital No 2 Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) Wallis Island Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant) Maxmara Trinity Pty Ltd (Seventh Defendant) Lin Zhu (Eighth Defendant) Gemi Investments Pty Ltd (Ninth Defendant) Weriton Finance No 2 Pty Ltd (Tenth Defendant) Saddleback Mountain Estates No 2 Pty Ltd (Eleventh Defendant) Maxmara and JA International Pty Ltd (Fifteenth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Hall (Second Defendant) Mr MW Young SC (Fourth, Tenth, Eleventh Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate