NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Edwards v Merlaust Pty Ltd (Costs) [2024] NSWSC 25 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 02 February 2024 Decision date: 02 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: Mr and Mrs Edwards bear Merlaust's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – offers of compromise – where a Calderbank offer is made – where offer is made pre-trial – where offer is only made for a very limited period – where offer is not renewed before appeal – where offer requires the parties to enter a non-disparagement deed – where offer is the only basis relied on for a departure from the usual costs order Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 52A, r 11 (repealed) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 20.26 Cases Cited: Amaca Pty Ltd v Novek (2009) 9 DDCR 199; [2009] NSWCA 50 Brymount Pty Ltd (t/a Watson Toyota) v Cummins [2005] NSWCA 69 Edwards v Merlaust Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1477 Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press Ltd (1995) 38 NSWLR 404 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 Monie v Commonwealth (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 15 South Sydney Council v Morris (No 3) [2001] NSWCA 200 Category: Costs Parties: Andrew Edwards (First Plaintiff) Maureen Edwards (Second Plaintiff) Merlaust Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M V Sahade (Plaintiffs) Q Rares (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate