NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 7 Hearing dates: 15 November 2023 Date of orders: 1 February 2024 Decision date: 01 February 2024 Before: Leeming JA at [1] White JA at [5] Mitchelmore JA at [6] Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — adjudication — whether adjudication determination was affected by jurisdictional error — whether adjudicator denied respondent to adjudication procedural fairness — whether basis of adjudicator's determination regarding retention monies was in issue on the adjudication — whether respondent could reasonably anticipate basis of determination regarding retention monies — denial of procedural fairness material Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Construction Contracts (Security of Payments) Act (NT) Cases Cited: Ausenco Operations Pty Ltd v Ferretti International Ottoway Pty Ltd [2020] SASC 46 Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd (2010) 78 NSWLR 393; [2010] NSWCA 190 Commissioner for ACT Revenue v Alphaone (1994) 49 FCR 576 Demex Pty Ltd v McNab Building Services Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 261 Downer Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd v Energy Australia (2007) 69 NSWLR 72; [2007] NSWCA 49 JKC Australia LNG Pty Ltd v INPEX Operations Australia Pty Ltd (2018) 41 NTLR 149; [2018] NTCA 6 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421; [2019] HCA 3 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ (2016) 259 CLR 180; [2016] HCA 29 Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Luikens [2003] NSWSC 1140 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 273 CLR 506; [2021] HCA 17 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 264 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd (Appellant) Ceerose Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Paul Roberts (Second Respondent) ABC Dispute Resolution Service (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Gor (Appellant) D Hume (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate