NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Carsal and Associates Pty Ltd t/a Triggerpoint Natural Health Centre v Crozier [2024] NSWSC 26 Hearing dates: 3 – 4 October 2023 Date of orders: 1 February 2024 Decision date: 01 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See [95] Catchwords: COMMERCE – restraint of trade – validity and reasonableness – length and scope of restraint – enforcement and remedies – compensation – where contract between plaintiff health centre and defendant independent chiropractor contained restraints of trade – where restraints of trade were to operate during and after the term of the contract – where the defendant terminated the contract and commenced providing chiropractic services to clients in Newcastle – whether the restraint of trade clauses are valid – consideration of Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW), s 4 – held that a 12 month duration is not a reasonable period of restraint and is invalid – consideration of the quantum of damages that would have been awarded if the plaintiff had succeeded on the issue of liability and the Court had accepted that a period of 12 months was reasonable for the restraints of trade Legislation Cited: Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW), s 4 Cases Cited: Hanna v OAMPS Insurance Brokers Ltd [2010] NSWCA 267; (2010) 202 IR 420 Isaac v Dargan Financial Pty Ltd (2018) 98 NSWLR 343; [2018] NSWCA 163 Jardin v Metcash Ltd [2011] NSWCA 409; (2011) 285 ALR 677 Miles v Genesys Wealth Advisers Ltd [2009] NSWCA 25; (2009) 201 IR 1 NE Perry Pty Ltd v Judge (2002) 84 SASR 86; [2002] SASC 312 Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 10; (2003) 77 ALJR 768 Smith v Ryngiel [1988] 1 Qd R 179 Stacks/Taree Pty Ltd v Marshall (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 77 Stenhouse Australia Ltd v Phillips [1973] 2 NSWLR 691; [1974] AC 391 Tullett Prebon (Australia) Pty Ltd v Purcell [2008] NSWSC 852; (2008) 175 IR 414 Woolworths Ltd v Olson [2004] NSWCA 372 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Carsal and Associates Pty Ltd t/a Triggerpoint Natural Health Centre (Plaintiff) Natalie Crozier (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Allen (Plaintiff) T Boyle (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate