NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tenenboim v R [2024] NSWCCA 1 Hearing dates: 13 September 2023 Date of orders: 09 February 2024 Decision date: 09 February 2024 Before: Stern JA at [1]; Harrison CJ at CL at [2]; N Adams J at [50] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against sentence. (2) Allow the appeal. (3) Quash the sentence imposed by McClintock SC DCJ on 6 September 2021 and in lieu thereof, sentence the applicant to an aggregate sentence of 16 years commencing on 7 June 2018 and expiring on 6 June 2034 with a non-parole period of 10 years and 3 months expiring on 6 September 2028. (4) The indicative sentence for the sequence 54 offence is 13 years and 1 month after a 12.5 % discount. (5) The indicative sentence for the sequence 55 offence is 10 years and 6 months after a 12.5% discount. Catchwords: APPEAL – crime – sentence discount for guilty plea – sentencing discount to aggregate sentence rather than indicative sentences APPEAL – crime –– several times the commercial quantity of cocaine – whether this was an error of fact in sentencing APPEAL – crime – sentencing – objective seriousness – reference to "many multiples of the commercial quantities" – whether this was an error to the extent it referenced cocaine SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – role of appellate court – exercising the sentencing discretion afresh – effect of Kentwell v The Queen Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 16A(2), 16A(2)(c), 16A(2)(g), 16A(2)(j), 16A(2)(k), 16A(2)(p) and 16A(2)(ja) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 22, 53A, 53A(1), 53A(2), 53A(2)(b), 68, 68(3), Pt 3 Div 1A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 11.2A, 302.2(1), 307.1(1), 311.2(1) and 311.4(1) Cases Cited: AE v R [2023] NSWCCA 74 Chan v R [2023] NSWCCA 206 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie (2017) NSWCCA 301 Ibbotson (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 92 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Patel v R [2022] NSWCCA 93 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 R v Delzotto [2022] NSWCCA 117 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dov Tenenboim (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Bashir SC with R McMahon (Applicant) C O'Donnell SC with A McGrath (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate