NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mie Force Pty Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2024] NSWCA 23 Hearing dates: 31 October 2023 Date of orders: 13 February 2024 Decision date: 13 February 2024 Before: Ward P at [1]; White JA and Kirk JA at [122] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – Construction – Interpretation – Construction of insurance contract – Whether appellant fell within definition of "Named Insured" in the Policy – Where appellant supplied labour to a sub-contractor undertaking demolition works for principal contractor – Whether "agent" in Policy bore the strict legal meaning of "agent" or more colloquial meaning of intermediary or someone who provides services for another – Whether as a sub-sub-contractor of principal contractor the appellant was a sub-contractor of the principal within the meaning of the policy – Whether appellant was an "agent" of the sub-contractor Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 50 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Limited v Rawsons Homes Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 224 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Property Rights Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99; [1973] HCA 36 Cherry v Steele-Park (2017) 96 NSWLR 548; [2017] NSWCA 295 Comalco Aluminum Ltd v Garraway Metals Pty Ltd (Full Federal Court of Australia, 8 December 1993, unrep) Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Falkiner v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [1973] AC 565 George 218 Pty Ltd v Bank of Queensland (No 2) (2016) 313 FLR 287; [2016] WASCA 182 GIO General Ltd v Centennial Newstan Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 13 International Harvester Co of Australia Pty Ltd v Carrigan's Hazeldene Pastoral Co (1958) 100 CLR 644; [1958] HCA 16 Kennedy v De Trafford [1897] AC 180 McMurray v AIG Insurance Limited [2018] WASC 144 Menz v Wagga Wagga Show Society Inc (2020) 103 NSWLR 103; [2020] NSWCA 65 Mie Force Pty Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2022] NSWSC 1606 NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 10) (2000) 107 FCR 207; [2000] FCA 1558 Petrofina (UK) Ltd v Magnaload Ltd [1984] QB 127 Phoenix Commercial Enterprises Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2010] NSWCA 64 Rawson Homes Pty Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2020] NSWSC 1654 South Seas Drilling Co v Esso Australia Ltd (Supreme Court (Vic), Crockett AJC, O'Bryan and Vincent JJ, 21 September 1988, unrep) Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co Ltd v Hans Bo Kristian Holgersson trading as Holgerssons Complete Home Service [2019] WASCA 114 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of England (4th ed), vol 1, Agency P Watts, W Bowstead and F M B Reynolds, Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (22nd ed 2021, Sweet & Maxwell) The Interpretation of Contracts in Australia (2nd ed) Lewison & Hughes Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mie Force Pty Ltd (Appellant) Allianz Australia Insurance Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Insall SC (Appellant) D Lloyd SC with C Coventry and J Hart (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate